(Warning: The following contains uncomfortable information and spoilers for Joker. Read at your own risk.)
I was debating whether or not to see this movie. Initially, I was intrigued by a grittier reimagining of a beloved DC character, even at the expense of some dubious feedback. Then the reviews poured in, were increasingly mixed and turned me off. Then I heard a full synopsis via The Big Picture, and my curiosity was piqued. But I wasn’t sure if it was worth getting a ticket, until my grandfather called me up the day before Sukkot and asked to see it that afternoon. Between the confusion and constant questions, I was fully-convinced I’d walked out of one of the most-perplexing experiences ever once it was done.
That was several days ago. I’ve since had conversations with family, heard it referenced by my Rabbi in his sermon and mulled over my thoughts more. I knew I wanted to write about it, but what to say: do I discuss how it misunderstands the philosophy of Anarchy? Do I mention the “we live in a society” rhetoric it keeps banging the viewer over the head with? Perhaps the ableism with its stance on dwarfism? Maybe how it lazily critiques the 1%, all-the-while clumsily retconning Batman’s origins? These are all valid, but what strikes closest to home is its stance on mental illness.
When I was 7 years-old, I was sexually assaulted by an older boy who was supposed to discuss my ADHD diagnosis. I didn’t think much of the games he asked me to play, so I buried the event for nearly 20 years. Unfortunately, because of how the mind copes, my assault manifested itself as a bad addiction that spiralled out-of-control in university. From 2009 to 2017, I remained in a state of semi-denial, finally attending an addiction support group following a seminar at a local synagogue.
I mention this because while the support group proved unsuccessful, my history with addiction, anxiety and medication should’ve made me sympathize with Arthur Fleck. But I don’t. Because while Arthur is a mentally-unwell individual with a history of abuse, his transformation into a comic book villain is fetishized without much to say. It’s a futile exercise in sympathizing with a bad role model, and it doesn’t work. It, in some ways, actively angers me.
Take Arthur’s condition: he has a neurological disorder that makes him laugh uncontrollably. The film links it with the childhood abuse he received from his mother’s partners, but the film never expands on this causation. Wouldn’t it have made for an interesting angle to delve more into? The movie doesn’t quite agree, instead using it to justify the suffocation of his mother.
Arthur’s condition’s also never properly explored beyond its surface level. When he’s amusing that child on the bus, to the mother’s annoyance, it’s mentioned that his laugh is uncontrollable, but that’s never elaborated on. Arthur’s condition keeps resurfacing, but instead of using that to discuss how mental illness is a serious issue, it’s instead factored into his, rather repetitive, spiral to Joker-levels. Arthur never gets help, and while that’s “the point”, I also think it hampers potential subtext.
Additionally, I was mixed on Arthur’s kill count. Some of his victims, like the drunk businessmen and Murray, I understood, while others, like his co-worker and the psychiatrist in the final scene, confused me. And even when his murders were “justified”, the movie went out of its way to make their deaths unpleasant. I never once felt like they weren’t played up for any other reason than shock-value.
Arthur also became increasingly difficult to sympathize with. I get that we’re supposed to be “rooting” for an anti-hero whose life’s falling apart. I also get that we’re supposed to sympathize for someone who’s unwell. I’ve seen Taxi Driver and Memento, so I know that both can be done well. But Joker fails because, in my mind, I can’t get behind his choices. And that saddens me.
The point of no return was when Arthur tells his co-workers that he’s off his meds, and that he feels better without them. As someone who’s been down that road, that’s the wrong decision to fetishize. Going off my meds might’ve seemed like a good idea back in 2010, but it quickly spiralled my emotions out-of-control. I became verbally aggressive, I constantly got into arguments with friends and family, and I lacked good judgement. I might’ve had an uptick in my appetite, but that’s one gain for a dozen losses. It wasn’t worth it, and I’m disappointed that that’s positioned as “character growth”.
The weirdest part about Arthur’s transformation is that he becomes a symbol for the anti-1% movement. I have no love for the ultra-wealthy, but “eat the rich” was never meant to be conflated with “support complete chaos”. It’s true that the 1% hoards wealth, but the answer isn’t murder. There’s a reason why wealth taxes and jails exist, after all!
You know what doesn’t help? How unpleasant the experience is. Joker runs a little over 2-hours, but the only part I smiled at was a clip from Modern Times. Ignoring how a crowd of wealthy people laughing at it didn’t get the chuckles it was looking for, I was happy because it was Charlie Chaplin. It’s sad when I’d much rather watch that than Joker.
That’s my problem: there are semblances of good ideas, but the film doesn’t know what to do with them. The theme of anti-1% fervour could’ve gone somewhere interesting, but it didn’t. The other theme of mental illness goes places it shouldn’t. Even the whole “we live in a society” speech that Arthur gives on Murray’s show before murdering him feels more condescending than appropriate. Joker, essentially, is a movie off of its meds. And while you could argue “that’s the point”, it never feels sincere.
If there’s one saving grace, aside from the camerawork, it’s the performance of Joaquin Phoenix. True to what even the detractors have claimed, he’s mesmerizing. He really gives it his all. I’ll be surprised if he doesn’t receive an Oscar nomination, as he’s earned it. I’m merely disappointed the material was elevated by his acting, as he deserved better.
As for the rest of it? I’m not biting. The performances are all solid, including Robert De Niro, but nothing about Joker is elevated to greatness like Phoenix. It’s a mediocre movie trying to be a great one, and it fails. If you want a better examination of anti-heroes or mental illness, there are plenty of options to choose from. And while it’s “good” that superhero properties are taking risks, I prefer conventional stories if the results keep producing films like Joker. The superhero sub-genre deserves better.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to detox…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts (Monthly)
-
Korrasami sucks, everyone. Honestly, I was debating how to start this one off: do I go for the verbose “Korra and Asami is a terrible f...
-
Is the book always better? This is a debate that’s been going on for a long time. So long, in fact, that you probably don’t remember its ori...
-
There’s plenty I can say about Agatha All Along . Like how it made me care for an antiheroine who murders other witches. Or how, despite bei...
-
It’s been rather rough this week. On Tuesday night, I spent the evening watching the American election results in real time. Despite not ant...
-
Movies have a weird effect on me the second time around. Sometimes I like them more, having gotten over the initial reaction and moved to a ...
-
Another year gone, another year of reflection. Politics wise, it was the year of Donald Trump’s presidential hopefulness, Justin Trudeau ove...
-
I’ve been mixed on writing this for some time. I’ve wanted to on many occasions for 7 years, namely in response to the endlessly tiresome ra...
-
One of the annoyances about The Acolyte ’s cancellation is that the show wasn’t afraid to venture into new territory. For one, it came befo...
-
( Warning: This piece discuss some heavy subject matter. Read at your own risk.) There are many statements I can make about Fox News: they...
-
Internet, it’s time we had a little talk. *Grabs the collective body by the ear and drags it to a private space* This is Frozen . I’m s...
Popular Posts (General)
-
Korrasami sucks, everyone. Honestly, I was debating how to start this one off: do I go for the verbose “Korra and Asami is a terrible f...
-
( Note: The following conversation, save for formatting and occasional syntax, remains unedited. It’s also laden with spoilers. Read at you...
-
It was inevitable that the other shoe would drop, right? This past month has been incredibly trying . On October 7th, Hamas operatives infi...
-
I recently watched a YouTube video deconstructing Howl’s Moving Castle . Specifically, it drew on The Iraq War parallels and how they held ...
-
(Part 1 can be found here .) (Part 2 can be found here .) At E3 2005, Nintendo announced their latest console . Dubbed “The Nintendo ...
-
Ableism’s an unusual kind of bigotry. It’s prevalent in how we communicate, and it shapes how we live our lives. The biggest offenders on a ...
-
On March 3rd, 2009, Warner Bros.’s animation division released an original, direct-to-video feature about comics’ prized superheroine, title...
-
I’ve been mixed on writing this for some time. I’ve wanted to on many occasions for 7 years, namely in response to the endlessly tiresome ra...
-
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm and I have a weird relationship. I’ve seen plenty of Batman films, being a huge fan of the character, but none...
-
This week marks the third in a period of the Jewish calendar called " The Omer ". That was one of the hardest sentences that ...
No comments:
Post a Comment